Springers, how, why and are they worth it?

  1. Welcome to 6x6 World.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Looking forward to seeing you in the forums and talking about AATVs!
+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 90

Thread: Springers, how, why and are they worth it?

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn, WI
    Posts
    885
    Quote Originally Posted by whipper-ag View Post
    There are members out there that have commented that I should have been sharing more about my suspension for the good of the hobby. Been wondering since you started this project why aren't you sharing your build with it's own thread? Is this your project or a Mudd Ox/ Max project? Mudd Ox / Max can talk about it. When I did my 1st springer in 2007, I didn't know if it would work, but I still posted a step by step build to help people understand what I was doing & why. That said, I have a question. The pics in Shock & Awe say the front has 3" travel & the rear will have 5". How's that going to work & why did you decide to make it that way.?
    R & D isn't easy, but it's always nice to see someone else's build & ideas. Still wanting to see more on Bugeyed 99's Hustler build, too.

    Whipper
    Nice to have you join the discussion member whipper-ag and thank you for the interest and questions. I would think it nice to be asking the questions rather than answering them for a change.

    My members album "Shock & Awe" contains pictures I have collected of suspension ideas along with concepts I have put together for use on production AATVs. I consider the projects my own and not Mudd-Ox/Max projects. Matt of Mudd-Ox was kind enough to allow me to test my individual tower concept on one of his demo Mudd-Ox XLs.

    Well, demos don't seem to last long at Mudd-Ox but Matt was in the process of building a XL to use as a test bed for a number of possible upgrades. I guess you could say the timing was right so I put my design into Solid Works and had a friends shop lazer and weld parts for me to assemble into 8 complete suspension tower assemblies. (I'm an idea guy, way to lazy to do production)

    What I find interesting is people look at the red Mudd-Ox with the suspension towers and that's all they see. They do not see the 1.6 liter ford 60hp EFI engine or prototype control panel or the fancy ultra bright LED headlights or number of other things the machine is testing.

    The way I look at it Matt is testing a design for free using time I don't really have on a machine I don't need to purchase and am not even really sure I would care to own personally.

    There are no build thread for a couple of reasons, but the main one is I like to use my gallery to draw pictures from when I start a thread. Sort of like I am doing now. Think of it like sitting down after a vacation and putting all your pictures together to show friends and family rather than sending them every picture as you take it. I find I jump around on projects and some don't get finished right away so just building an album first seems to make better sense for me. (look at the Coot or Coot2 albums as an examples, their going on right now also).

    With that said the Max II "box" design is just spin off of the "tower". A Mudd-Ox is a big heavy commercial sort of pricey piece of equipment to me. The tower idea worked but dimensionally and component price is sort of limited to that application. I knew it worked so how small, light and inexpensive can I go? That is what you will see if you look at my latest Shock and Awe album pictures.

    Matt was kind enough to loan me a roller Max II so I can fit my concept "Suspension Boxes" to it. The front left box (also works as the right rear) only has 3 inches of travel because initially the shock I was going to use sort of limited it to that amount of travel and I was worried about how much angle the u-joint assemblies would take with the offset.

    The left rear box has an 1.5" offset and 5" of total travel and is fitted with a different shock now.

    Next you will see a center box that has centered axle and 5" of travel. The idea is to be able to alter the wheel base to run 26x16 Vendettas on wheels offset inwards 3". My experience reforming my Max IV body has me pretty convinced I can devise a method to heat form the body with arches to clear the tires keeping the machine pretty narrow. The suspension boxes should also be able to be fit to all sorts of other machines with very little effort, but this is assuming it all works.

    Hope this answers your questions and sorry if I broke some sort of forum "build thread etiquette".
    Last edited by kghills; 01-25-2015 at 03:29 PM. Reason: grammer

    ADAIR TRACKS, WITHOUT 'EM YOUR JUST SPINNING YOUR WHEELS
    REMEMBER KIDS, THE FIRST "A" in AATV STANDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,161
    Keith:
    Make it rain suspended Max2s all up in here.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NJ 08533
    Posts
    5,052
    I'd like to see it work and be affordable to the masses,suspension being minimal yet affordable would be nice.


    My new beer holder spilled some on the trails - in it's hair and down it's throat.
    Joe Camel never does that.

    Advice is free, it's the application that costs.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn, WI
    Posts
    885
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel Woods View Post
    Keith:
    Make it rain suspended Max2s all up in here.
    Noel as much as I am enjoying the suspension projects I really have no desire to go into production. That will be someone else' deal. And it assumes there is a market and the perceived value is there. Remember, the Max II is just a test bed. The goal is to have a full line of suspension kits available to work on current and past AATVs that can be made with the components from a Max II kit. Then it might rain. I like the idea of rain. It makes mud.

    Quote Originally Posted by ARGOJIM View Post
    I'd like to see it work and be affordable to the masses,suspension being minimal yet affordable would be nice.
    I am pretty convinced at this point that the design will work Jim and I think you are right on the money. At this point I am thinking a suspension kit will cost half of what a set of tracks would cost, maybe even less than that. I am thinking that should make it an affordable upgrade for a new or used machine.

    Keith.
    Last edited by kghills; 01-26-2015 at 10:35 AM.

    ADAIR TRACKS, WITHOUT 'EM YOUR JUST SPINNING YOUR WHEELS
    REMEMBER KIDS, THE FIRST "A" in AATV STANDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    1,470
    what is your current hub projection from the body and what is the wheel diameter requirements and offset.
    Acta non verba

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn, WI
    Posts
    885
    Quote Originally Posted by jerseybigfoot View Post
    what is your current hub projection from the body and what is the wheel diameter requirements and offset.
    Marc I get just over 7" to the face of a stock axle to the tub and Just under 14" from the axle face to the tub with the suspension.

    with stock 8" wheels and 21" tires I am measuring 66" total width.

    The upright fits in a stock 8" wheel with lots of clearance to offset the wheels inward.

    The plan is to run wheels that are offset 3" more towards the body to reduce the overall width (the wheels Tim at Adair has for his Max II track kits). This would give you a total width of 60". When running tracks it should be just about the same width as a tracked Max II without a suspension.

    How does that compare to the total width of the copperhead?

    Keith.

    ADAIR TRACKS, WITHOUT 'EM YOUR JUST SPINNING YOUR WHEELS
    REMEMBER KIDS, THE FIRST "A" in AATV STANDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Brooklyn, WI
    Posts
    885
    Quote Originally Posted by jerseybigfoot View Post
    what is your current hub projection from the body and what is the wheel diameter requirements and offset.
    Marc, I had a chance to mock up the Max II suspension box project with the 26x16x12 Vendettas on K-Lock wheels I offset 2.5".

    The width with the suspension fully extended is 65" so as the parallelogram arcs up it should be about 66" wide when the axle is horizontal. Close to 2/3 the tire seems to be covered by the body with this combination.


    Hope these details are what you were after, Keith.

    ADAIR TRACKS, WITHOUT 'EM YOUR JUST SPINNING YOUR WHEELS
    REMEMBER KIDS, THE FIRST "A" in AATV STANDS FOR AMPHIBIOUS

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    1,470
    Thanks Keith,
    8" rims with the normal offset just fit my springer. Maybe get 1-1.5" offset out of 9" rims. It looks like 12" with 2 1/2" is the route to take.
    Acta non verba

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    northern Wisconsin
    Posts
    892
    I really like the way the wheels cover up the suspension so it's not so vulnerable. Can't wait to see it in action. Nice job.
    What it lacks in ground clearance it makes up for with traction.

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Waldo Wi
    Posts
    941
    looks cocky

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts