Russian AATV

  1. Welcome to 6x6 World.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Looking forward to seeing you in the forums and talking about AATVs!
+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Russian AATV

  1. #21
    i agree, the wheeled version is an argo knock off with a real kool looking upper body, the chain system looks like they took it right off the argo web site. as with most things russian and china, they have to reverse engineer everything sadly. the main issue i would have would be the motor, argo and max for that matter always used kohlers and briggs for a reason, bullet proof. parts i think would be a nightmare . i would love to try one on my property in maine thats for sure. if anyone has a chance please post it.

  2. #22
    i agree, the wheeled version is an argo knock off with a real kool looking upper body, the chain system looks like they took it right off the argo web site. as with most things russian and china, they have to reverse engineer everything sadly. the main issue i would have would be the motor, argo and max for that matter always used kohlers and briggs for a reason, bullet proof. parts i think would be a nightmare . i would love to try one on my property in maine thats for sure. if anyone has a chance please post it.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    TUCSON
    Posts
    777
    I LOOKED AT THAT VIDEO, nothing but problems. better to have a set of tracks over tires, better flotation and no debris to get lodged in their.

  4. #24
    I stumbled across this lil rig today....

    Thanks
    Ty Turner

    870-818-1315
    tyturnersoffroad@yahoo.com

    JESUS ROCKS

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    1,153
    That heavy pig really tears up the terrain. An normal 6x6 or 8x8 with tracks leaves much less of a destructive path.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    shenendoah valley,va.
    Posts
    2,631
    they sure have alot of great mud over there !! j.b.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Hanover,PA
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by john swenson View Post
    they sure have alot of great mud over there !! j.b.
    J,B You need to take your Max II over there and show them how it's Done !

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,161
    Quote Originally Posted by john swenson View Post
    they sure have alot of great mud over there !! j.b.
    Yes, the Germans experienced it first hand during WW2. This vehicle seems to use the narrow track system of their German adversaries. I would think that a country that designed a great tank like the T34 with its super wide tracks which handled mud and snow well, would use the same concept of wide tracks for superior traction and floatation. The machine in the video appears to struggle with those average grade obstacles and sure tore up the ground it operated on.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by Noel Woods View Post
    Yes, the Germans experienced it first hand during WW2. This vehicle seems to use the narrow track system of their German adversaries. I would think that a country that designed a great tank like the T34 with its super wide tracks which handled mud and snow well, would use the same concept of wide tracks for superior traction and floatation. The machine in the video appears to struggle with those average grade obstacles and sure tore up the ground it operated on.
    In fairness I'm sure this machine produces many times less PSI than a T-34 wide tracks or not. And thus no "tank" could drive where it is. In some sense track width is retaliative. A Tiger II appears to have very wide tracks yet produces ground pressure well above any 4x4 tire when aired down. Or more pressure than a theoretical 1,000 pounds ATV with 8 foot long 1" wide tracks.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,161
    My tank example was an analogy. I was more concerned about track width and floatation and not comparing this AATV with a tank.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts