Adair tracks or beaverdam argo tracks

  1. Welcome to 6x6 World.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Looking forward to seeing you in the forums and talking about AATVs!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Adair tracks or beaverdam argo tracks

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Adair tracks or beaverdam argo tracks

    What do you think about tracks for mud and snow for my 2018 argo outfitter. Anybody have any experience with beaverdam tracks. Please leave feed back

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NJ 08533
    Posts
    5,052
    You will have to check with Adair on Outfitter availability, a few years back I had asked about the Centaur equipped with Adairs and there was a possible weight concern.
    I'm sure development may have progressed.


    My new beer holder spilled some on the trails - in it's hair and down it's throat.
    Joe Camel never does that.

    Advice is free, it's the application that costs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    169
    I have been very happy with the addair tracks. They go through mud really easily and it's nice to be able to take them in the water to swim.

  4. #4
    I am resurrecting this dead thread as opposed to starting a new one. I am curious about both these track systems and would love to hear additional feedback if anyone out there has any experience with either of the two...

    Specifically, how have either of them held up? Performance on the water?

    I'd be putting them on an old '95 Response 8X8.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NJ 08533
    Posts
    5,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Redhorse View Post
    I am resurrecting this dead thread as opposed to starting a new one. I am curious about both these track systems and would love to hear additional feedback if anyone out there has any experience with either of the two...

    Specifically, how have either of them held up? Performance on the water?

    I'd be putting them on an old '95 Response 8X8.
    I do not think the Beaver Dam tracks would fit on a Response without going to a smaller tire. Most people are happy with the Adairs.


    My new beer holder spilled some on the trails - in it's hair and down it's throat.
    Joe Camel never does that.

    Advice is free, it's the application that costs.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Wasilla, AK
    Posts
    923
    not sure how much under-tire thickness Beaverdam grousers have, but they’re probably similar. As long as you have 22” tires, you’d be okay. Wheel spacer-wise, it depends on how high their belt height is in comparison to rear bearing extensions (if your machine has them). More than likely, you’ll need a larger-than-factory spacer because the beaverdam grouser is very square (or it always used to be) and has a wider contact patch. So unless the guides (and belt) are very low, then they’ll probably require oversized spacers. 10” wide tires vs 12” do offer additional clearance all things being equal, but grouser width on the inside and belt height will determine. ….unless they’ve tweaked it to be like other builders

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts