Can anyone think of a reason NOT to move the fuel tank on my 8x8 to the rear. Move the battery also?
I’d like to try and even out the weight distribution as we all know the argo is very nose heavy in the water and any bounce or unexpected “jump” results in the nose diving for the ground first.
Would moving weight to the rear maybe negatively effect the skid steer properties?
I’d also like to use the front “under seat” space to build a storage compartment. Theres lots of room in the Argo, but not much dedicated space to hold smaller things like straps, tools, jumper cables, etc. Right now that either has to roll around on the floor or I have to strap in a tool box or something similar. Tools boxes (etc) means I loose cargo space anyways, albiet it makes it easy to shift and r configure if needed. Would be nice to have built in space for that type of stuff, the things that we carry around on a more permanent basis.
Obviously I would loose some absolute cargo carrying space with the rear mounted tank. But I dont use my argo for hauling lots of stuff or hauling hunting kills out of the bush. Its mainly just people I haul around, which I’ll still be able to do just fine as I plan to put a bench seat over the rear mounted fuel tank.
After so many decades of building such nose heavy vehicles, I can’t believe ODG doesn't have a reason for NOT evening out the weight distribution in them. Unless its just about leaving the biggest cargo space open in the back they possibly can.
The Max's, Attex's, hustler's, etc seem to do fine with more weight in the rear. They actually appear to handle a little better/more predictable than an Argo with it's heavy front weight bias. While I don't have one of those "rear engine jobbies", the only negative seems to be reduced passenger/cargo space. They are all 6x6's though, and my argo is an 8x8. Might be a difference in handling there with more rear weight bias.
Of maybe I should just move the battery and leave the fuel tank where it is? The tank is 16" wide and the curve of the rear body means it would have to be slid forward quite a bit, resulting in a very wide rear bench. IF I just move the battery I can make a standard 12" wide seat right up against the back. That would allow me to "upsize" the battery (helpful with the winch and accessory lights I plan to install), create a storage compartment under the seat and still save a lot of passenger/cargo space.
Thoughts?
I’d like to try and even out the weight distribution as we all know the argo is very nose heavy in the water and any bounce or unexpected “jump” results in the nose diving for the ground first.
Would moving weight to the rear maybe negatively effect the skid steer properties?
I’d also like to use the front “under seat” space to build a storage compartment. Theres lots of room in the Argo, but not much dedicated space to hold smaller things like straps, tools, jumper cables, etc. Right now that either has to roll around on the floor or I have to strap in a tool box or something similar. Tools boxes (etc) means I loose cargo space anyways, albiet it makes it easy to shift and r configure if needed. Would be nice to have built in space for that type of stuff, the things that we carry around on a more permanent basis.
Obviously I would loose some absolute cargo carrying space with the rear mounted tank. But I dont use my argo for hauling lots of stuff or hauling hunting kills out of the bush. Its mainly just people I haul around, which I’ll still be able to do just fine as I plan to put a bench seat over the rear mounted fuel tank.
After so many decades of building such nose heavy vehicles, I can’t believe ODG doesn't have a reason for NOT evening out the weight distribution in them. Unless its just about leaving the biggest cargo space open in the back they possibly can.
The Max's, Attex's, hustler's, etc seem to do fine with more weight in the rear. They actually appear to handle a little better/more predictable than an Argo with it's heavy front weight bias. While I don't have one of those "rear engine jobbies", the only negative seems to be reduced passenger/cargo space. They are all 6x6's though, and my argo is an 8x8. Might be a difference in handling there with more rear weight bias.
Of maybe I should just move the battery and leave the fuel tank where it is? The tank is 16" wide and the curve of the rear body means it would have to be slid forward quite a bit, resulting in a very wide rear bench. IF I just move the battery I can make a standard 12" wide seat right up against the back. That would allow me to "upsize" the battery (helpful with the winch and accessory lights I plan to install), create a storage compartment under the seat and still save a lot of passenger/cargo space.
Thoughts?
Comment