just wondering if anyone has found any difference on a 6x6 with tracks by not running the front chains or not running the rear chains ? does'nt perform as well , turns , etc. i know on some of the 8x8 some tires freewheel or chains are removed. thanks friends , j.b.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
tracks and chains
Collapse
X
-
thanks delduck for the reply ...so i guess you don't loose that much pulling power on the tracks with the front tires not engaged ? i imagine that depends also on the style of tire tread and wether your driving in real slippery mud or snow. i have noticed watching these homebuilt russian tracked 6 wheelers that they make using car rear axles that drive only the rear tires...it's impressive the deep mud and snow they drive through with only the rear tires driving the tracks.i think i'll give it a try to see the outcome. johnboy va.
Comment
-
I destroy my max 4 new axles,bearings chains, t20 trans rebuilt 2x, the list goes on but the 2 things that were the best overall improvements were remove the front chain and I made a support bar to go from center line of axle to axle. It’s made from a peice of steel shaped like a “U”. The machine is used for work so when something breaks, it is somewhat paid for in the job cost but those 2 were the best improvements for my tracks. I have rubber tracks and have tried many others, I’m sticking with the old rubber style as long as I can keep getting them. I have a morooka 125 n machine that has rubber tracks and it has 1 front drive sprocket and the rest of the tracks run threw the bogies and around the rear drive, same with the bobcat mini excavator. As long as you can keep pressure to the track they seem to work well.
Comment
-
thanks again...i'm going to give it a try. i've got some pretty good mud holes here at home in the pasture. i'm interested to see if there is any difference in the tire gripping on a track with space between the grousers compared to solid rubber tracks. it may not matter . i do have some rubber inbetween my modified tracks. i know on my adair max 2 track set, the tires that came with it were a '' waffle '' style tread .. not real aggresive. sometimes in really deep gooey mud the tires spun in the tracks. my tires now are more of a mud grip pattern. i'll let you know how it goes on my testing . maybe someone else will chime in with some experience they have had. j.b.
Comment
-
I’m running Adair’s on 25” Rawhides on my IV and removed the front chains with no issues. I run mostly in snow. I figure if the going gets that tuff some slippage is good on a relatively light duty machine.What it lacks in ground clearance it makes up for with traction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AJB View PostSo in theory, if you remove the front chains, and throw them under the seat, you would have a back up plan if one of the others break?sigpic
My new beer holder spilled some on the trails - in it's hair and down it's throat.
Joe Camel never does that.
Advice is free, it's the application that costs.
Comment
-
i did remove the max 2 front chains and ran at busco's heavy mud in april . i did'nt notice any tire slippage in the tracks, and a little more power and easyier turning. i did'nt get alot of riding that weekend because i lost a track early on. ( not because of the chain ) . i'm going for it again after the track repair . j.b.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ArgoNewf View PostHope i can get some input. I have a 2006 Big Foot 6x6 tracked. Should i remove the front chains ? less wear ? I like the idea of keeping them in the Argo for spare if rear fails. Thanks from Newfoundland !!! TUG O WAR GUIDING !!!
Comment
-
For the Max and Hustlers out there removing the front chains is a good thing. That doesn't work for Argo though. I've never ran without chains on the Argo, but looking at the chain dynamics it should work fine to remove the rears. For those with the Mud Ox, the rear chain can also be removed, and really needs to be removed.
Comment
Comment