Has anyone noticed 22x10-8 Goodyear Runamuck's being different diameter? Can this cause track problems?
Here is the long winded back story:
I purchased this argo 8x8 last summer. It had eight 22x10-8 runamucks and a spare.
One tire has a patch (on the outside, not well done). The guy said he had it that way for years with no issue. Of course, on my 3rd use this winter, the tire wasn't holding air.
I order two of these online thinking they were identical to the ones on the argo.
Goodyear Runamuck Front Rear 22 10 8 2 PSI ATV Tire ARM3A8 | eBay
When they came in the mail, my first thought was, hmm those look smaller and more "square". The top of the tires has a more flat shape. I figured it was just because they are not inflated.
Now, I have the tracks off. I noticed that one of the 8 tires on the argo, has more of this same square shape! It also is just a 22x10-8 runamuck. But, I checked the rough diameter of the tire, it is at least 2 inches smaller than the rest of the tires! And, all of the other tires have a much rounder appearance and are about 2" more in diameter. They appear much taller. This tire is more flat across the top.
I did this after adjusting all of the pressures in all 8 tires to be 6 psi. I used a sensitive pressure gauge.
So, this winter, I was having issues with the track on one side. I have powder extensions added by the original dealer. Metal L bar's bolted to about a 6 inch wide rubber piece. The tracks or channels or both are slapping the underside of the plastic tub, especially at high speed. At the time, I thought that the tires might be over inflated and this was causing the track to ride high, and hit underneath.
when I pulled the argo into my garage today, the whole argo was leaning to that side, noticeably. I took a lot of air out of the tires on that side when I was up at my cabin, hoping to eliminate the contact.
Now, I am thinking, the track was not tight enough, due to UNDER inflation causing slop and the tracks to be loose enough to make contact. But, there is one major factor I wasn't aware of. One of the 8 tires is smaller that the others. AND it was installed in the rear of the argo. So, this would reduce the effective circumference the track had to ride around on that side by an inch or more, causing it to be too loose, even with proper tire inflation.
Questions:
1. Do you think this could be the cause of my track problem?
2. Has anybody else noticed these different sized runamuck's that are supposedly identical tires? I have checked all info on sidewalls of all tires, they all read exactly the same!
3. If I end up replacing more of these tires (since they are all pretty old and balding) with these smaller versions, will my tracks fit properly? How will I get them tight? (temporarily I plan to move the smaller tires to the middle positions and use the older larger tires on the ends. but what happens when I have to replace those?)
Here is the long winded back story:
I purchased this argo 8x8 last summer. It had eight 22x10-8 runamucks and a spare.
One tire has a patch (on the outside, not well done). The guy said he had it that way for years with no issue. Of course, on my 3rd use this winter, the tire wasn't holding air.
I order two of these online thinking they were identical to the ones on the argo.
Goodyear Runamuck Front Rear 22 10 8 2 PSI ATV Tire ARM3A8 | eBay
When they came in the mail, my first thought was, hmm those look smaller and more "square". The top of the tires has a more flat shape. I figured it was just because they are not inflated.
Now, I have the tracks off. I noticed that one of the 8 tires on the argo, has more of this same square shape! It also is just a 22x10-8 runamuck. But, I checked the rough diameter of the tire, it is at least 2 inches smaller than the rest of the tires! And, all of the other tires have a much rounder appearance and are about 2" more in diameter. They appear much taller. This tire is more flat across the top.
I did this after adjusting all of the pressures in all 8 tires to be 6 psi. I used a sensitive pressure gauge.
So, this winter, I was having issues with the track on one side. I have powder extensions added by the original dealer. Metal L bar's bolted to about a 6 inch wide rubber piece. The tracks or channels or both are slapping the underside of the plastic tub, especially at high speed. At the time, I thought that the tires might be over inflated and this was causing the track to ride high, and hit underneath.
when I pulled the argo into my garage today, the whole argo was leaning to that side, noticeably. I took a lot of air out of the tires on that side when I was up at my cabin, hoping to eliminate the contact.
Now, I am thinking, the track was not tight enough, due to UNDER inflation causing slop and the tracks to be loose enough to make contact. But, there is one major factor I wasn't aware of. One of the 8 tires is smaller that the others. AND it was installed in the rear of the argo. So, this would reduce the effective circumference the track had to ride around on that side by an inch or more, causing it to be too loose, even with proper tire inflation.
Questions:
1. Do you think this could be the cause of my track problem?
2. Has anybody else noticed these different sized runamuck's that are supposedly identical tires? I have checked all info on sidewalls of all tires, they all read exactly the same!
3. If I end up replacing more of these tires (since they are all pretty old and balding) with these smaller versions, will my tracks fit properly? How will I get them tight? (temporarily I plan to move the smaller tires to the middle positions and use the older larger tires on the ends. but what happens when I have to replace those?)
Comment