Tracks and Chain Tensioners

[fdmt]

Hello,

I have a question about running Rubber Argo Tracks on an older Argo (1997 Conquest 8X8). I believe I read that the older tensioners are more forgiving with the chain wind-up, as the newer one will ratchet, until reset. Is there any truth to this? If so, does this make Adair's Track Turners less important on the older Argo's? Also, I read that Bolduc Tracks came with harder slider blocks, but I can not find any information on R.S. Buldoc Co.

Thank you
FDMT

[Buzz]

older style tensioners are less likely to break from full, downward driving force (caused by non-indexed tires) because they are able to move up and down, unlike ratcheting style tensioners. But you’ll still have to deal with increased load on chains when running because even when tires are indexed properly, the center tires will always have to overdrive the corner tires, to some extent (on all tracks), some more than others. The tuners are beneficial in all track situations because they reduce load that is caused by variations in tire size, and they allow you to optimize ride quality and track tdnsion without worrying about chain and tensioner side effects. It’s nice to be able to juggle pairs of tires around. The main reason your particular machine should not run rubber tracks is because your drivetrain is not designed to take that kind of load. Those tracks require a lot of power to drive and especially to turn, and the load on your drivetrain will beat down that argo model in short order. Track tuners and upgraded axles will help, but transmission parts will begin getting harder and harder to find.

[fdmt]

Thank you Buzz. I appreciate your knowledge. I will take that in to consideration. I had planned to upgrade the axles to the HD axles and bearings, but your transmission concern worries me.