Originally posted by 2014SE
View Post
That being said I bought my 2004 Conquest (GU/low tranny) a couple of years ago in like new condition with every option imaginal including a hardtop and it is twice the machine that my previous machine was and that was a 26 HP Avenger (with high geared tranny).
The big difference is I made the mistake of thinking that with 26 hp under me that would offset the weight of running tracks, in deep snow, at high (sometimes 10,000+) altitudes. WRONG! Even in the summer on tires the thing was vapor locking due to the engine having to work too hard at altitude during steep climbs. I sold it and bought a Polaris Ranger 6x6 with tracks. The tracks were too hard on it so I sold the tracks, kept the Ranger as our summer/fall ride (I call it my mountain cadillac because it is so smooth on rocky trails) and lucked (great deal) into my Conquest as our mini snowcat.
Short story long that is why I am encouraging Twisted to put the GU tranny in because (according Argo and I agree) the ratio that is "optimized" for track use in that machine and the machine does not have to work as hard to get from A-B. Even in your 31 HP EFI Avenger I would say that if you do change the tranny out I would not go higher than the MU or medium geared tranny especially if you are running the Escargos in deep snow. Your Avenger will thank you and I think the machine will perform better for you. Just my two cents. I am on my 5th Argo and I should have know better when buying that last Avenger. Live and learn.
Comment